Donald Trump

Supreme Judicial Court justice upholds commission decision on Trump

Supreme Judicial Court Justice Frank Gaziano upheld the decision of the State Ballot Law Commission, which last week dismissed a challenge alleging Trump is ineligible for office due to his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol that sought to overturn his electoral defeat

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA – JANUARY 27: Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump  speaks during a campaign event at Big League Dreams Las Vegas on January 27, 2024 in Las Vegas, Nevada. Trump is campaigning in Nevada ahead of the state’s Republican presidential caucuses on February 8. (Photo by David Becker/Getty Images)
Getty Images

A judge on Massachusetts' highest court denied a bid to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the Republican presidential primary ballot, writing Monday that the complaint essentially "come[s] too soon" in the election cycle.

Supreme Judicial Court Justice Frank Gaziano upheld the decision of the State Ballot Law Commission, which last week dismissed a challenge alleging Trump is ineligible for office due to his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol that sought to overturn his electoral defeat.

WATCH ANYTIME FOR FREE

icon

Stream NBC10 Boston news for free, 24/7, wherever you are.

The three-member commission concluded it does not have jurisdiction over the case brought by parties including Free Speech for People and civil rights firm Lichten & Liss-Riordan. Gaziano agreed, writing that state law gives the panel authority over "any nominee for state, national or county office" or "certificates of nomination or nomination papers filed in any presidential or state primary."

"Trump's place on the ballot was not secured through the submission of nomination papers, nor, at this stage, is he the subject of any certificate of nomination or a nominee," Gaziano, who was appointed to the court in 2016 by former Gov. Charlie Baker, wrote. "... Because Trump's appearance on the primary ballot is not pursuant to 'nomination papers,' this provision does not apply."

"The petitioners' objections have, in essence, come too soon," Gaziano added. "If there is any question whether the commission has the authority or jurisdiction to consider the petitioners' objections regarding Trump's eligibility to appear on the general election ballot, that question will not become ripe until, and if, he is selected as his party's nominee for President. That question is not currently before me."

Gaziano pointed out that the question of whether Trump is eligible to serve as president under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution could soon be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, which is set to hear oral arguments next week in a case concerning Colorado officials barring the former president from the ballot.

Free Speech for People, which is represented by former Democrat U.S. Senate and attorney general candidate Shannon Liss-Riordan, said challengers plan to "immediately" appeal Gaziano's ruling to the full SJC.

Copyright State House News Service
Contact Us