Supreme Court to Decide if Police Can Track Cellphones Without Warrant - NBC Boston
National & International News
The day’s top national and international news

Supreme Court to Decide if Police Can Track Cellphones Without Warrant

They will hear an appeal from Timothy Carpenter, who was sentenced to 116 years in prison after being convicted of armed robberies in Michigan and Ohio

Find NBC Boston in your area

Channel 10 on most providers

Channel 60 and 8 Over the Air

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    Supreme Court to Decide if Police Can Track Cellphones Without Warrant
    Aaron P. Bernstein/Getty Images
    The Supreme Court is seen in in this file image from April 10, 2017 in Washington, D.C.

    In a new case about digital age technology and privacy, the Supreme Court will consider whether police need warrants to review cellphone towers records that help them track the location of criminal suspects.

    The justices agreed Monday to hear an appeal from Timothy Carpenter, who was sentenced to 116 years in prison after being convicted of armed robberies in Michigan and Ohio.

    Police obtained records from cellular service providers that placed Carpenter's cellphone in the vicinity of the robberies.

    The question is whether police should have to demonstrate to a judge that they have good reason, or probable cause, to believe Carpenter was involved in the crime. Police obtained the records by meeting a lower standard of proof.

    Dramatic Video Shows N. Korean Soldier’s Sprint to Freedom

    [NATL] Dramatic Video Shows N. Korean Soldier’s Sprint to Freedom

    A North Korean soldier made a desperate dash to freedom and was rescued by South Korean soldiers, according to dramatic video released by the U.S.-led U.N. command Wednesday.

    (Published Tuesday, Nov. 21, 2017)

    Courts around the country have wrestled with the issue. The most relevant Supreme Court case is nearly 40 years old, before the dawn of the digital age.

    The federal appeals court in Cincinnati ruled that police did not need a judge-issued warrant.

    Nathan Freed Wessler, the American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who represents Carpenter, said the high court should apply constitutional privacy protections to digital records. "Because cell phone location records can reveal countless private details of our lives, police should only be able to access them by getting a warrant based on probable cause," Wessler said.

    The robberies took place at Radio Shack and T-Mobile stores in 2010 and 2011. Carpenter organized most of the robberies, in which he signaled the others in his group to enter the stores with their guns drawn, the government said in its Supreme Court filing. Customers and employees were herded to the back and the robbers filled their bags with new smartphones. They got rid of the guns and sold the phones, the government said.

    Police learned of Carpenter's involvement after a confession by another person involved in the holdups. They got an order for cellphone tower data for Carpenter's phone, which shows which towers a phone has connected with when used in a call. The records help approximate someone's location.

    The case, Carpenter v. U.S., 16-402, will be argued in the fall.

    Gun Owner Takes Hammer to Prized AR-15 Rifle

    [NATL]Gun Enthusiast Reacts to Mass Shootings by Smashing Prized AR-15 Rifle

    Chad Vachter, a gun enthusiast and second amendment supporter, took a hammer to his prized thousand-dollar AR-15 rifle in response to the mass shootings happening across the U.S.

    (Published Tuesday, Nov. 21, 2017)